![]() It appears that Hale was intending to contribute some of the changes/improvements from the console version back to the community in the event of a successful relicensing. #Nexuiz pc beta licenseIt's not like Mesa where the contributors agreed to a relicensing because it was from GPL to another open-source license - it was an attempt to take a GPL work closed, and if I were one of those contributors, I would have been in that 20%. Let's face it - this is about the only way it could have worked out. I don't know you but I'm getting used to his bursts of insulting statements. It's sad that LH now makes it look like thanks to the unreasonable (ex)developers of Nexuiz now there will be no improvements flowing back to GPL Nexuiz. That was the very reason because the Xonotic project was born, we as developers just can't trust Alientrap (which is only Lee Vermeulen) anymore. Not to mention that after the deal was made public there was no dialog *at all* between Lee Vermeulen (the owner of Nexuiz) and the developers, there was no attempt at all to fix what they done (again, stealing), mostly because you actually need to talk in order to fix things. In other words what they done is just stealing.Īnd of course they must rewrite the whole Nexuiz codebase now, that's the only way for them to prevent getting sued. #Nexuiz pc beta codeIn my opinion there is no way to consider that this deal was morally right, there was people who were contributing code on a daily basis for *years*, the least you will expect is to get some sort of notification if someone is about to make money out of your hard work. Not a single developer knew about the Nexuiz deal, not a single notification was sent, most of us knew about it when we saw the the homepage was changed, only providing a small link to "Nexuiz GPL" at the bottom. He can't really say that the original plan was to contact every developer, the deal was made in complete and absolute secret. Just don't copy the code verbatim, or in such as a fashion as to be considered a direct copy.Ī reasonable person could see the GPL as encouraging the re-use of ideas, whether by modifying the original code and redistributing it, or by re-implementing those ideas in new code. So there ya go- have fun studying, examining reduplicating the functionality, style and format of the code in question. #Nexuiz pc beta freeAnd since it expressly doesn't restrict you in areas other than those 3, you're free to examine and study it to your heart's content. So GPL code doesn't have restrictions on things other than copy, distro, and mods. Once you accept GPL as the basis for your work, you don't get to distribute the modified work with extra terms. GPL code doesn't have additional restrictions on it. "You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. So the GPL doesn't limit your rights for things outside of copying, distro and mods. "Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are notĬovered by this License they are outside its scope." Under the terms of this General Public License." "This License applies to any program or other work which containsĪ notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed From paragraph 0 of the GPL v2, thanks for the link, btw. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |